Ethical Reaction Accounting To the Dilemma †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About the Ethical Reaction Accounting To the Dilemma? Answer: Introduction: The process of simulation of the human intelligence as performed especially by the computers is referred to as the AI or Artificial Intelligence. The self-driving cars, autonomous in nature, outfitted with AI, have been conducting in-depth learning just like human brains (Deng, 2015). It has been felt that the implementation of such cars in real life could give birth to risks. However, there lie various expectations from such advanced technology. For the purpose of the given case study, ethical dilemmas, responses and values confronting AI are assessed. Ethical dilemma confronting AI: As the laws are unable to guide, returning to the moral compass is observed. Some of the ethical dilemmas identified are regarding: The Trolley Problem: Autonomous cars might face some no-win situations. Operating programs of them is expected to choose the lesser evil. However, it is an unreasonable faith to presume that the programming would sort the problems without any deliberate discussion on ethics. Human beings never think much regarding the difficult and uncomfortable choices to save others lives, but programmers have to do detailed analysis on that. Ethics regarding number of life of people in danger is incomplete and nave (Conitzer et al., 2017). Conflicting values, duties and rights come into play here. The road ahead: The responsibilities of the automated cars must vary. Some of the AI cars could be obligated in dangerous situations to sacrifice themselves with their occupants. Others might not do such. For common sense in risk, the insurance is the ultimate line of defense. There is an argument that insurance industries would go belly-up as the risk of insurance against gets minimized (Bonnefon, Shariff Rahwan, 2016). The susceptibility of the cars to hacking is a concern. The way it would behave under hijack or breaking in is likely to be seen. Ethical response to the dilemma according to the consequences alone: For obvious reasons there have been no-win scenarios. This has been really bad for both the AI consultant and customers of the cars. As any human driver makes any fatal snap-decision during emergency, it would be just a tragic accident. The driver would be hard-pressed to be blamed upon. However, if any AI driver performs the same mistake it stays no longer any unfortunate reflex. It is like a premeditated homicide. The AI consultant must suggest the cars to be programmed such that its behavior is purposely trained or scripted. Hence there lies imposition for the legal liability (Burton et al., 2017). There are ethical responses as any automaker thinks that it would be better to choose one persons life than more than one. It could be said that there has been decision to be assumed right. However, if decided systematically the protection to the driver is ber alles be faulted. This is especially in such cases where the decision of design has been made by consulting the AI consultants in secret unilaterally. Ethical response to those dilemma according the principles and duties of AI consultant: The first problem about the ethical response according to any consistent principle applications is that the futures of the AI-cars are unpredictable. However, the AI consultants have various tasks required to perform. One part of the issue is the lack of imagination of the AI consultants. The responsibilities of the AI consultants have been in the horseless carriage level of the technology. They have been aware of describing the technology as they are not rather than fighting over what they have been truly (Casey, 2017). The AI-cars has not been replacing the human drivers just like the human drivers when fist came into being did not replace the horses. The decision of the AI consultants would impact the automating transportation. This would the change our society in radical approaches. Only ethics could help guiding it. Ethical response to the dilemma according response of caring persons: The assistive technologies for the disabled and the aging populations have been pioneered by various researches. However there have been risks regarding the dependency of the assistance of artificial intelligence companions for the caring persons. Regarding the autonomous cars, the researches should ask cogent queries about the usage of its creations. The ethics at the interface of the robot-human is required to be addressed. Ethical does about human beings and for the machines are needed to be analyzed. It has been a serious subject of concern for various growing nations. There should be legislations targeting the issues of AI cars. There should be professional ethical codes for the designers of robots and the engineers like other disciplines (Malle et al., 2015). As per as caring of persons are concerned issues must be factorized regarding deployment, building and designing of robots. The ACS Code of Professional Conduct: An important professional characteristic is been required for the members to follow the ethical codes. The code of ACS, has been established as professional conducting code as a part of the regulations in the society. These could be applied to any member of the ACS. Working in the area of ICT or Information and communication technology, has determined six fundamental ethical values. Along with these necessities for the professional conducts are included. The society has been demanding the members to follow the values and acts with integrity and responsibilities. The code has been intended as a collection of rule for the acceptable models to be practiced in the ICT industry. It has been backed up by the advisory materials for particular fields like artificial intelligence (Bostrom Yudkowsky, 2014). The artificially intelligent cars have been now able to tackle various everyday tasks. The technologies have been continuing to evolve. With the tackling of different jobs it has been overthrowing the employers working on those specific tasks. However, various organizations have been embracing such tasks saving energies. The human beings have been lying over the edge of the inflation point. The self driving cars have been come out on todays roads, the harbingers of the driverless world. The world of the self-driving cars has been appealing for certain reasons as discussed in a session of ACS strategy. The time wasted over traffic could be put for better usages (Bringsjord Sen, 2016). Despite these, the world wide usage of the autonomous cars indicates that professional drivers would be thrown out of their professions. There would be millions of truck drivers that have been standing to lose their work as the self-driving cars become a norm. Provide defenses on ethical grounds: The AI has been able to collect and assess videos from various users. Thus they could alert them about the potential dangers. The gathered information could send to a network, using real-time interpretation. This has been done for anticipating the smartest action course for the cars minimizing harms or doing away with the accidents completely. It would also be able to alert other drivers as detected by another user or included in any crash. The AI delivers the pivotal connection between the autonomous future and contemporary vehicles. Presently, most of the cars do not involve the continuous functioning sensors or cameras which could sort the accident avoidance or detection (Stock, Guerini Pianesi, 2016). However, various organizations are looking for such technologies. These would become reality in the years to come. Thus various benefits could be provided by such autonomous vehicles avoiding accidents on the roads. Solving of the ethical dilemma by AI consultants: The self-driving cars could help in putting an end to the quantity of tragic incidents with serious injuries occurring more often in the current world. Regardless the quantity and quality of self-resistance and crash-avoidable functionalities the car may possess, it is urged to be urged to the drivers from the side of AI consultants to drive responsible with caution. The AI consultant should observe certain points (Etzioni Etzioni, 2016). Making sure that the driver is sober: As drink is consumed, it is not suggested to go beyond the wheel-period. Being well rested before starting journey: Like the drunk driving, the fatigue driving could be just as dangerous as it. Following the posted laws of traffic: The rules are meant for keeping the system and others secured. Paying attention on the roads: Every distraction must be put away like the cell phones. Avoiding the road rage: Keeping the anger and emotions in control is desired. Otherwise it could result in dangerous outcomes while driving (Etzioni Etzioni, 2016). Conclusion: As the autonomous cars have been becoming widespread, questions have been arising regarding security. This also includes the assurance that the technology is safe and tested properly before releasing on roads. The vehicles with their connected infrastructure create scopes for attacks. There have been also various questions regarding ethics. The automated cars have been promising high profits and undesired consequences difficult to indicate. Changes are inescapable and it has been not necessarily a poor factor by itself. However, the main damages and disruptions are to be avoided and anticipated wherever possible. This is responsibilities of ethics in the public policies as indicated by the ACS code of conduct. It could make the path for better future. However, it could also turn wreck as it is not kept looking ahead. References: Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.Science,352(6293), 1573-1576. Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence.The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, 316-334. Bringsjord, S., Sen, A. (2016). On Creative Self-Driving Cars: Hire the Computational Logicians, Fast.Applied Artificial Intelligence,30(8), 758-786. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., Koenig, S., Kuipers, B., Mattei, N., Walsh, T. (2017). Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence courses.arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07769. Casey, B. J. (2017). Amoral Machines, or: How Roboticists Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Law. Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Borg, J. S., Deng, Y., Kramer, M. (2017). Moral Decision Making Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence. Deng, B. (2015). THE ROBOT'S DILEMMA.Nature,523(7558), 24. Etzioni, A., Etzioni, O. (2016). AI assisted ethics.Ethics and Information Technology,18(2), 149-156. Etzioni, A., Etzioni, O. (2017). Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence.The Journal of Ethics, 1-16. Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., Cusimano, C. (2015, March). Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. InProceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction(pp. 117-124). ACM. Russell, S., Dewey, D., Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence.AI Magazine,36(4), 105-114. Stock, O., Guerini, M., Pianesi, F. (2016, February). Ethical dilemmas for adaptive persuasion systems. InProceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence(pp. 4157-5161). AAAI P